Adam Wharton makes Liverpool statement and tells Crystal Palace team-mates what cost them
Adam Wharton was speaking following Crystal Palace's 3-1 Premier League defeat to Liverpool at Anfield on Saturday afternoon
Adam Wharton believes his Crystal Palace side paid the price for not being ruthless enough in front of goal against Liverpool. Oliver Glasnerâs side fell to a 3-1 defeat at Anfield that prevented them from becoming the first ever team to beat the Reds four times in a season.
A quick-fire double from Alexander Isak and Andy Robertson put Arne Slotâs side in total control in the first-half before Florian Wirtz added a third in stoppage time after Daniel Munoz controversially reduced the arrears. But the Eagles created plenty of chances against the Premier League holders; Freddie Woodman made a couple of good saves, and Strand Larsen hit the inside of the post when the score was 2-1.
And England international Wharton believes the difference between the two sides was some clinical finishing from the Reds.
FOLLOW OUR LIVERPOOL FC FACEBOOK PAGE!All the latest news and analysis from Anfield on the Liverpool Echo's dedicated LFC Facebook page
âObviously we were disappointed with the result,â the midfielder said. âWe were coming here to get the win. I felt the performance was good, though.
âWe can look at it and take the positives. We created some good chances, and on another day we score a few more goals.
âThey were clinical and effective with the chances they got. We can look back on the positives, but ultimately weâre disappointed with the result.
"I think in the first-half we had a couple of good chances. We controlled them pretty well. But they had two breakaways and obviously theyâre a top team on the break. They had two half-chances and took them.â
Agreeing with Wharton, Palace boss Glasner said: "The difference was the efficiency. Liverpool were clinical, and we were not.
âThe goalkeeper had the day of his life, so congrats to him. We kept believing until the end. It was really positive, and this is what we take into the final weeks."
On Munoz's goal, Glasner said: "It was a difficult situation because he made a big save but the ball goes to Munoz. Everything goes so quickly. He could continue the game until the end and that's why we think it was the right decision. I think that is was OK.
"When you watch it on TV. It's on the edge, to be honest. He makes the save, then tries to get up then he raises his arm but Munoz is already taking the finish. If he hits his head then the game has to be stopped. It was the right decision I think.
Adam Wharton was speaking following Crystal Palace's 3-1 Premier League defeat to Liverpool at Anfield on Saturday afternoon
Adam Wharton believes his Crystal Palace side paid the price for not being ruthless enough in front of goal against Liverpool. Oliver Glasnerâs side fell to a 3-1 defeat at Anfield that prevented them from becoming the first ever team to beat the Reds four times in a season.
A quick-fire double from Alexander Isak and Andy Robertson put Arne Slotâs side in total control in the first-half before Florian Wirtz added a third in stoppage time after Daniel Munoz controversially reduced the arrears. But the Eagles created plenty of chances against the Premier League holders; Freddie Woodman made a couple of good saves, and Strand Larsen hit the inside of the post when the score was 2-1.
And England international Wharton believes the difference between the two sides was some clinical finishing from the Reds.
FOLLOW OUR LIVERPOOL FC FACEBOOK PAGE!All the latest news and analysis from Anfield on the Liverpool Echo's dedicated LFC Facebook page
âObviously we were disappointed with the result,â the midfielder said. âWe were coming here to get the win. I felt the performance was good, though.
âWe can look at it and take the positives. We created some good chances, and on another day we score a few more goals.
âThey were clinical and effective with the chances they got. We can look back on the positives, but ultimately weâre disappointed with the result.
"I think in the first-half we had a couple of good chances. We controlled them pretty well. But they had two breakaways and obviously theyâre a top team on the break. They had two half-chances and took them.â
Agreeing with Wharton, Palace boss Glasner said: "The difference was the efficiency. Liverpool were clinical, and we were not.
âThe goalkeeper had the day of his life, so congrats to him. We kept believing until the end. It was really positive, and this is what we take into the final weeks."
On Munoz's goal, Glasner said: "It was a difficult situation because he made a big save but the ball goes to Munoz. Everything goes so quickly. He could continue the game until the end and that's why we think it was the right decision. I think that is was OK.
"When you watch it on TV. It's on the edge, to be honest. He makes the save, then tries to get up then he raises his arm but Munoz is already taking the finish. If he hits his head then the game has to be stopped. It was the right decision I think.
